Why there’s no such thing as a “due” win
The gambler’s fallacy is the belief that a win is “due” after a run of losses. Here’s why every round of a chance-based game is independent.
The gambler’s fallacy is the belief that a win is “due” after a run of losses. Every round of a chance-based game is independent: a pokie, roulette wheel or deck shuffle has no memory of what came before.
Understanding this is one of the simplest ways to protect your budget — chasing losses doesn’t make a win more likely.
The gambler’s fallacy is the belief that a win is “due” after a run of losses. Here’s why every round of a chance-based game is independent.
Return to player is a long-run average, not a session forecast. Here’s the maths in plain English.
Head-to-head, line and totals — what each means when the finals roll around.
Licensed Australian wagering providers must offer a deposit limit. Here’s how to choose one and change it.
The national self-exclusion register explained, from sign-up to what it blocks.
Map handicaps and total maps make sense once you know the format.
What happens behind the camera, from betting windows to settlement.